Wouldn’t it be great if the US had a policy for preventing the kinds of tragedies that just occurred in Florida?
Wouldn’t it be great if “the whole community—from community members to senior leaders in government knew what to do upon the discovery of an imminent threat”?
If there was only a policy that would help us to “achieve the National Preparedness Goal of a secure and resilient Nation that is optimally prepared to prevent” disaster-related deaths and injuries within the United States.
If we only had “a framework that could provide guidance to individuals and communities, the private and nonprofit sectors, faith-based organizations, and all levels of government (local, regional/metropolitan, state, tribal, territorial, and Federal) to prevent, avoid, or stop a threatened” disaster by:
- “Describing the core capabilities needed to prevent an imminent threat
- Aligning key roles and responsibilities to deliver Prevention capabilities in time-sensitive situations;
- Describing coordinating structures that enable all stakeholders to work together; and
- Laying the foundation for further operational coordination and planning that will synchronize Prevention efforts within the whole community”
The good news: I’ve just described the National Prevention Framework.
The bad news: It excludes all disasters, except only terrorism.
Wait a minute….although it is cheaper, more effective, and more humane, the US National Prevention Framework excludes prevention from 99% of all US disasters, except terrorism? Yes, it does.
One must ask, “WHY?”
What is the very good reason for this obvious absence? And how does it reflect the Federal government’s “duty to protect” its citizenry as a functional modern state? I’m not able to find a good answer. (That’s usually a sign that something isn’t right).
Why does the US not have an “all-hazards” National Prevention Framework?
According to the US Department of Homeland Security, there is an organized process for the whole community to achieve preparedness. “The National Preparedness System integrates efforts across the five preparedness mission areas—Prevention, Protection, Mitigation, Response, and Recovery—in order to achieve the goal of a secure and resilient Nation. “
But, oddly enough, the scope of these Frameworks are very narrow when it comes to prevention and protection, and very broad when applied to mitigation, response and recovery.
A single-hazard national framework is simply bad policy.
Compare prevention to the other mission areas in this excerpt from page 7 of the DHS/FEMA National Prevention Framework:
“Prevention: The capabilities necessary to avoid, prevent, or stop a threatened or actual act of terrorism.
Protection: The capabilities necessary to secure the homeland against acts of terrorism and manmade or natural disasters.
Mitigation: The capabilities necessary to reduce loss of life and property by lessening the impact of disasters.
Response: The capabilities necessary to save lives, protect property and the environment, and meet basic human needs after an incident has occurred.
Recovery: The capabilities necessary to assist communities affected by an incident to recover effectively”
WHY do we wait for tragedies to happen and then hope (against hope)?